Is this a mistake in the release candidate announcement? It pretty clearly states: """ This release will feature, ... * Overloaded record fields """ Thanks! -deech On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 5:20 PM, aditya siram <aditya.siram@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm trying out the GHC 8.2.1 release candidate [1], added 'OverloadedRecordFields' and I get an error saying it's an 'Unsupported Extension'. Am I doing something wrong?
This is not in 8.2, it may be in 8.4.
(The Status page is confusing: it has a header for it, but the text says: "...but no OverloadedRecordFields extension or...". Perhaps the header should be changed to "Progress on overloaded record fields"?)
-- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net