Re: [Haskell-cafe] Re: [Haskell] Monads Terminology Question

Sorry to interject a noob comment, and maybe I am not understanding the question but why not just call MonadState etc. Monad subclasses? "get" and "put" would then be Monad subclass functions. -deech On 4/12/10, Stephen Tetley wrote:

Hi Conor

Chuan-kai Lin uses 'effect basis' in the ICFP paper on the Unimo monads, otherwise I've seen 'operations' used. I'm on the fence for 'effect basis' vs. 'non-proper morphisms', but biased against 'operations' (as its not sufficiently characteristic).

Best wishes

Stephen _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe