Re: [Haskell-cafe] Need some advice around lazy IO

Hi Kashyap I am not sure if this solution to your problem but try using Bytestring rather than String in parseXML' :: String -> XMLAST parseXML' str = f ast where ast = parse (spaces >> xmlParser) "" str f (Right x) = x f (Left x) = CouldNotParse Also see this post[1] My Space is Leaking.. Regards, Mukesh Tiwari [1] http://www.mega-nerd.com/erikd/Blog/ On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:11 AM, C K Kashyap wrote:

Oops...I sent out the earlier message accidentally.

I got some profiling done and got this pdf generated. I see unhealthy growths in my XML parser. https://github.com/ckkashyap/haskell-perf-repro/blob/master/RSXP.hs I must be not using parsec efficiently.

Regards, Kashyap

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 11:07 AM, C K Kashyap wrote:

...

I got some profiling done and got this pdf generated. I see unhealthy growths in my XML parser.

On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:12 PM, C K Kashyap wrote:

...

Hi folks,

I've run into more issues with my report generation tool .... I'd really appreciate some help.

I've created a repro project on github to demonstrate the problem. git://github.com/ckkashyap/haskell-perf-repro.git

There is a template xml file that needs to be replicated several times (3000 or so) under the data directory and then "driver" needs to be run. The memory used by driver keeps growing until it runs out of memory.

Also, I'd appreciate some tips on how to go about debugging this situation. I am on the windows platform.

Regards, Kashyap

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Kim-Ee Yeoh wrote:

...

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Konstantin Litvinenko wrote:

...

Yes. You (and Dan) are totally right. 'Let' just bind expression, not evaluating it. Dan's evaluate trick force rnf to run before hClose. As I said - it's tricky part especially for newbie like me :)

To place this in perspective, one only needs to descend one or two more layers before the semantics starts confusing even experts.

Whereas the difference between seq and evaluate shouldn't be too hard to grasp, that between evaluate and (return $!) is considerably more subtle, as Edward Yang notified us 10 days ago. See the thread titled To seq or not to seq.

-- Kim-Ee

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe