Anton van Straaten <anton@appsolutions.com> wrote:
Achim Schneider wrote:
"Rich Neswold" <rich.neswold@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Manlio Perillo <manlio_perillo@libero.it>wrote: ...
But this works only if the database is used by only one process.
Ah. When you said "concurrent safe", I thought you meant within the application. You're looking for something like this<http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/anydbm> .
Or even HApps-State (http://happs.org/) for moar 0v3rk1ll, of which you can never ever have enough.
HAppS-State doesn't currently solve the problem of the database being used by more than one process (does it?) In the current stable version, it basically maintains its data in-memory and keeps a checkpointed transaction log.
After watching the BayFP presentation I assumed that they've got cross-master synchronising going, and that's nearly a year old news now. Merely synchronising processes is trivial if you can do that. If the HAppS documentation wasn't as lacking as it is or I'd have more time, I would know more about this. -- (c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for copyright history. All rights reserved. Copying, hiring, renting, performance and/or broadcasting of this signature prohibited.