27 Dec
2009
27 Dec
'09
2:34 p.m.
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 8:59 AM, Felipe Lessa
Hmmm... but, assuming a preprocessor, you probably would be able to transform this code:
[snip]
The only part missing here is being able to run only a small part of the arrow's computation and then return another Action.
Is my example contrived? Am I missing something? :)
Assuming a sufficiently smart preprocessor you can do anything you'd like, but the result isn't an arrow. ;) -Edward Kmett