On Fri, 2007-06-07 at 18:43 -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
It doesn't appear to be either of these. My own projects use no form of pre-processing and exhibit exactly the same problem: a parse error on first character of the line after the first Haddock comment. I don't know if the Haddock project itself (whose output I put up here) uses pre-processing, but I know for a fact my code does not.
The haddock project does.
Parse error on the first line after a Haddock comment is a givaway that you have bad haddock syntax, either in the comment itself or possibly the .cabal file (you need to escape slashes in the package description - that was a big pain to figure out for me).
And there it was. The .cabal file was the culprit, not the Haskell source. Thanks, Stefan. -- Michael T. Richter <ttmrichter@gmail.com> (GoogleTalk: ttmrichter@gmail.com) I'm not schooled in the science of human factors, but I suspect surprise is not an element of a robust user interface. (Chip Rosenthal)