3 Jun
2008
3 Jun
'08
5:15 p.m.
On 2008-06-03, Peter Hercek <phercek@gmail.com> wrote:
Loup Vaillant wrote:
2008/6/3 Darrin Thompson <darrinth@gmail.com>:
<--cut--> What's the appeal of this? I personally love git, but I thought all the cool kids at this school used darcs and that was that.
Disclaimer: I'm no expert, this is what I've heard. Anyone please confirm or deny the following?
Basically, git is waaay faster than Darcs on a number of use cases.
Other reason can be "git rebase". Of course there is a question how good practice it is ... but it is being used.
Darcs patches are pretty much an implicit rebase. -- Aaron Denney -><-