8 Apr
2014
8 Apr
'14
9:21 a.m.
No, there is no theory behind it. I personally feel it convenient. 在 2014-04-08 04:58:30，"Kim-Ee Yeoh" <ky3@atamo.com> 写道： On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:02 PM, ducis <ducis_cn@126.com> wrote: It lets your write lambdas with 'slots' without inventing names for the parameters. [s| ı + ı |] = \x y -> x+y I have no background in this 'slot lambda' and a search reveals this package as the only hit. Which may explain why I find the example given confusing. Why would [s| 1+1 |] not be equivalent to \x->x+x ? -- Kim-Ee