
Don't forget that some languages use <> to mean "different" (as if
"different" meant always "superior or inferior"...), so some beginners might
get confused.
I personally often define the alias:
(<+>) = mappend
2011/7/24 Maciej Wos
Personally, I have nothing against mempty (although I agree that mid makes more sense), but I don't like mappend at all. I wonder what happened to the idea of using <> instead of mappend (that's what I always do). I think
a <> b <> c
looks so much better than
a `mappend` b `mappend` c
and it solves the name problem altogether.
-- Maciej On Jul 24, 2011 3:42 AM, "KC"
wrote: _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe