13 Jun
2007
13 Jun
'07
1:49 p.m.
PR Stanley <prstanley@ntlworld.com> writes:
Hi Can you think of a fourth way of redefining disjunct using pattern matching? vee :: Bool -> Bool -> Bool vee _ True = True vee True _ = True vee _ _ = False
In the same spirit: f False False = False f _ _ = True