If I had to guess, I'd say that was likely around when Austin was playing with the way we handle submodules. There was a bunch of churn on that front in 2013-2014 or so. -Edward On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Dimitri DeFigueiredo < defigueiredo@ucdavis.edu> wrote:
Hello folks,
I was looking at this:
https://www.openhub.net/p/ghc/analyses/latest/languages_summary
And was really surprised by the graph. Is this correct!? Did the complexity of GHC's codebase significantly increase in 2014? Can anybody shed a light on why that is?
Cheers,
Dimitri
-- 2E45 D376 A744 C671 5100 A261 210B 8461 0FB0 CA1F
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to: http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.