26 Jun
2009
26 Jun
'09
2:10 a.m.
Thanks. I'll go with the monad for now. Geoffrey On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Lennart Augustsson<lennart@augustsson.net> wrote:
Use 1. You'll probably need a monad in the type checker soon or later anyway, e.g., for handling errors.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Zsolt Dollenstein<zsol.zsol@gmail.com> wrote:
I think you should also take a look at the value-supply package. At least that was my solution for scope analysis issues.