On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 19:14, Dan Piponi <dpiponi@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Rafael Gustavo da Cunha Pereira Pinto <RafaelGCPP.Linux@gmail.com> wrote:
Those different representations are derived from my (very) low Haskell handicap! :-D
BTW That wasn't intended in any way as a criticism. I think it's
Not taken!
interesting to look at real matrix code that people have written and think about what would be needed in a library to make it easier to write. -- Dan
What I miss most is a data structure with O(1) (amortized) direct access. One of the changes I thought today was to remove the ++ operator and create a list of lists that I would concat in the last call. -- Rafael Gustavo da Cunha Pereira Pinto Electronic Engineer, MSc.