It's reasonably easy to read.
But you could make it more readable. Type signatures, naming the first
lambda...
On 9/25/07, Andrew Coppin
While using Haskell, I often find myself writing convoluted constructions such as this:
show_system = unlines . zipWith (\l ms -> "Eq" ++ show l ++ ": " ++ (concat $ intersperse " + " $ zipWith (\n x -> x ++ " x" ++ show n) [1..] (init ms)) ++ " = " ++ last ms ) [1..] . map (map (take 8 . show))
And people complain that *Perl* is bad? This function is quite obviously absurd. I mean, it works, but can *you* figure out what it does without running it? The question is, can anybody think of a better way to write this function? (And more generally, functions like it.)
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe