Re: [Haskell-cafe] What is simplest extension language to implement?

Because he would have either to recompile the whole program or to use things like hint, both implying that GHC must be installed on the user side (600Mo+ for GHC 6.12.3) Isn't there a way to use some stripped-down version of ghc and the base

On 11/02/2010 10:40 AM, Yves Parès wrote: libraries, providing only what the user really needs, in versions which are known to work, and supply that together with the application? I'd love to use haskell as a configuration language, provide some combinators and effectively get the rest for free. But it is not acceptable for a user to go through the mess of installing a ghc environment on, say, Windows, only to change some settings.

2010/11/2 Lennart Augustsson mailto:lennart@augustsson.net>

I don't understand. Why don't you use Haskell as the scripting language?

On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Permjacov Evgeniy mailto:permeakra@gmail.com> wrote: > Let us think, that we need some scripting language for our pure haskell > project and configure-compile-run is not a way. In such a case a > reasonably simple, yet standartized and wide known language should be > implemented. What such language may be? > R(4/5/6)RS ? > EcmaScript ? > Some other ? > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe