Sorry, my last email got sent too quickly. Anyway, continuing my thought. So QuickCheck can classify tests: +++ OK, passed 100 tests (29% Short) Can tasty display this classification info? That was a thing I missed a lot in test-framework and would probably motivate me to switch to tasty. Janek ----- Oryginalna wiadomość ----- Od: "Roman Cheplyaka" <roma@ro-che.info> Do: haskell-cafe@haskell.org Wysłane: wtorek, 6 sierpień 2013 22:51:57 Temat: Re: [Haskell-cafe] ANNOUNCE: tasty, a new testing framework * John Wiegley <johnw@fpcomplete.com> [2013-08-06 13:40:50-0500]
Roman Cheplyaka <roma@ro-che.info> writes:
I am pleased to announce the first release of tasty, a new testing framework for Haskell. It is meant to be a successor to test-framework (which is unmaintained).
It would be nice to see a comparison of the various test frameworks and why one might select one over another. I use hspec currently (which also integrates with HUnit, QuickCheck, etc.), and couldn't tell at a glance what tasty might offer. And I particularly dislike writing tests inside of a gigantic list; I much prefer the "monadic" style of hspec.
This has been discussed on reddit here: http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/1jr8lb/tasty_a_new_testing_framewor... Roman _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe