The type (String -> Maybe (a, String)) should already be an instance of arbitrary if a is. One way of generating functions is to have some sort of hashing function (a -> Int). Functions from a to b can be generating by using the hash value to transform the random seed before the b is generated. Here is a rough outline for such a system: genB :: StdGen -> B hashA :: A -> Int transformGen :: Int -> StdGen -> StdGen genFun :: StdGen -> (A -> B) genFun g a = genB $ transformGen (hashA a) g In QC you have this instance: (CoArbitrary<http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/QuickCheck/2.1.0.1/doc/html/Test-QuickCheck-Arbitrary.html#t:CoArbitrary> a, Arbitrary<http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/QuickCheck/2.1.0.1/doc/html/Test-QuickCheck-Arbitrary.html#t:Arbitrary> b) => Arbitrary<http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/QuickCheck/2.1.0.1/doc/html/Test-QuickCheck-Arbitrary.html#t:Arbitrary> (a -> b) And CoArbitrary is the class where you implement the trick described above. Look at the function called variant as well. /J On 16 September 2010 02:59, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljenovic@gmail.com
wrote:
On 16 September 2010 01:58, Thomas Davie <tom.davie@gmail.com> wrote:
Firstly, as far as i can tell, one cannot declare a type synonym to be an instance of a type class, thus how would you make it an instance of Arbitrary?
The standard solution here is to create a newtype, and generate them instead.
I've also written and used dedicated generation functions (especially for Strings, since I don't want _really_ arbitrary strings since some of them might accidentally bring up formatting that my parser can't cope with (or will parse as something else). Note that this is more for generating sub-parts of other data types, rather than for types I want to be able to run QC tests on.
-- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic Ivan.Miljenovic@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe