13 Dec
2012
13 Dec
'12
2:11 a.m.
"Clint Adams"
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:45:48PM -0500, Clark Gaebel wrote:
This is a silly issue.
It certainly seems to be. If it were serious, I'd like to think that people would be attempting to get actual legal advice instead of spouting anti-copyleft FUD.
Well, actual legal advice comes from actual lawyers, who often want actual money. I'm interested in what you saw as "anti-copyleft FUD" though. That the code might be subject to the GPL and that caused problems? That's the only thing that did come from a lawyer. And it's really the only negative thing I saw about the GPL in this thread.