No. It will be it's own package on hackage. On Tuesday, November 12, 2013, Hans Höglund wrote:

It is actually confirmed that GHCJS will go into an official GHC release? I have not been able to find that information on the GHC tracker.

I have tried GHCJS, Haste and the UHC-JS in the past and found Haste the most easy to install and use. As far as I know, GHCJS and Haste are the only compilers to support all GHC extensions.

Of course, this actualizes that old question of whether pervasive use of GHC-only extensions is A Good Thing... yet still I keep finding {-# LANGUAGE DeriveTraversable, ViewPatterns, TypeFamilies … #-} on top of my source files.

Regards, Hans

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Brandon Allbery

...

wrote:

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:32 PM, ?mer Sinan A?acan

...

wrote:

I'm aware of this, but when I first tried it a few months ago, it was

not easy to use at all. Is it changed now?

The biggest bump in usability will come from it not being just in HEAD

with everything about building it that that implies. (next release of GHC

will have it)

--

brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine

associates

allbery.b@gmail.com

ballbery@sinenomine.net

unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad

http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________

Haskell-Cafe mailing list

Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org

http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe