Hello, Several days ago I posted a question about retargeting GHC to generate CIL so that Haskell could be a .NET language. One objection was Haskell "lazy" nature didn't fit well with .NET's CLR. I found a couple publications .... http://www.ddj.com/windows/184404967;jsessionid=0AVCEATVAEGKMQSNDLOSKH0CJUNN... ... more popular presentation http://docs.msdnaa.net/ark_new/Webfiles/WhitePapers/ECOOP.pdf ... this paper seems to be saying that Mondrian's "lazy" nature fits in quite well Any opinions from Mondrian people "listening" in? What lessons were learned from the Mondrian experience that could speak to Haskell in particular GHC? Regards, Vasili