30 Oct
2006
30 Oct
'06
7:59 a.m.
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 10:03:32PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
On 10/25/06, Frederik Eaton <frederik@a5.repetae.net> wrote:
It looks nice, but don't you think the -package-base flag ought to take both the package name *and* the mountpoint?
My intention was that -package-base specifies a base for the package specified in the preceding -package flag, but I'll clarify it in the document. In other words, it is an optional argument and the syntax is ghc ... -package PACKAGE -package-base BASE ... (giving package PACKAGE mount point BASE)
Otherwise, this looks like what I've wanted all along, if only I knew it ;-).
Excellent, thanks. Frederik -- http://ofb.net/~frederik/