Hello all, My question may appear to be absolutely FAQ, in the end. Sorry for that if it's true. I've run some algorithms using ghc, ghci and hugs during the weekend. Some of them required wast amount of memory. From the results obtained, it seems like hugs is more eager on memory consumption or it evaluates with a different strategy than the ghc(i) does. Is there any difference? If yes, where can I read it? If not, is memory consumption of hugs given "just" by the fact it uses spineless tagless G-machine and not a code compiled to the binary of the target? If it is the point, how can I change compilation to allocate as much memory as I have effectively usable on my machine - I will supply the number on cmnd line, but from certain limit above no effect seems to be made ? Dusan -- Dusan Kolar tel: +420 54 114 1238 UIFS FIT VUT Brno fax: +420 54 114 1270 Bozetechova 2 e-mail: kolar@fit.vutbr.cz Brno 612 66 Czech Republic --