20 Sep
2005
20 Sep
'05
7:27 p.m.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 12:25:00PM +0200, Benjamin Franksen wrote:
On Friday 16 September 2005 18:40, Glynn Clements wrote:
Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
In Haskell, code is data too because code in the sense of imperative actions is described by IO values. You cannot analyse them.
And thus they are not data.
Huh? I'd say they are not /concrete/ data, but (abstract) data they surely are(?)
and you are certainly free to turn them into concrete data by creating your own data type which you then can inspect and modify and then "interpret". John -- John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈