5 Feb
2008
5 Feb
'08
11 a.m.
On 05/02/2008, Cale Gibbard <cgibbard@gmail.com> wrote:
Personally, I think pt{x} for extracting the x field of pt seems not-so-unreasonable, and meshes well with the existing syntax for record updates.
I should clarify -- this is only if we can't somehow keep the existing function syntax for record extraction.