8 Apr
2002
8 Apr
'02
11:25 a.m.
Folks Following a good deal of email I now propose to DO NOTHING to the rules defining do-notation in the Haskell 98 Report. That means that GHC and Hugs, and nhc perhaps, should change so that they actually implement the do-notation translation rule do {e ; stmts} = e >> do {stmts} using (>>) and not (>>=).
From my reading of the email, some people will agree strongly, and no one will disagree strongly. I suppose I could be wrong about this, though.
Simon