Hello Tomasz, Monday, February 06, 2006, 8:29:32 PM, you wrote:
is it possible to implement unsafeInterleaveST?
TZ> I hope not. You surely shouldn't be able to implement this function TZ> without unsafe* functions, because that would break ST's guarantees. of course. i asked from language/library implementors. and of course it is already implemented and, at least in GHC, implementation is just the same as for IO, so if i will be smarter, i can done it myself TZ> Hell, you would be able to return frozen ST computations from runST! yes, i want exactly that, for the same reasons why one like the unsafe getContents implementation. if you are prefer to read entire files in memory, we are living in different worlds :) -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulatz@HotPOP.com