Re: Extending the do-notation

Sebastien Carlier wrote:

...

import Monad ... do y <- liftM unzip m1

Thanks.

I'm constantly amazed by the number of tricks one has to know before he can write concise code using the do-notation (among other things, I used to write "x <- return $ m" instead of "let x = m").

[snip] Why do you WANT to write concise code using the do-notation? Has someone revived the Obfuscated Haskell Contest, or do you find touch-typing difficult?