21 Nov
2005
21 Nov
'05
9:59 p.m.
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 08:54:35AM -0500, David Roundy wrote:
As an aside, what's responsible for the insanity of pattern matching record fields being backwards? I'd bar = b to bind b to bar, not the other way around... why should record pattern matching use '=' in a manner opposite from the rest of Haskell?
Perhaps it's better to think of '=' as asserting equality, than as binding? Andrew