hi, sorry for the double post yesterday, thomas had some sort of a problem sending mail to the list, so i sent the message instead, but i guess eventually both messages ended up being posted. Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
So I am happy to adopt your interpretation, but I'd like to clarify the wording. Here's an alternative sentence: The form "module M" names the set of all entities that are in scope with both an unqualified name 'e' and a qualified name 'M.e'.
Would that be better? Can you suggest anything else?
i think this formulation is better. bye iavor -- ================================================== | Iavor S. Diatchki, Ph.D. student | | Department of Computer Science and Engineering | | School of OGI at OHSU | | http://www.cse.ogi.edu/~diatchki | ==================================================