11 Mar
2002
11 Mar
'02
12:41 p.m.
Looking at the online GHC Users Guide, this flag is documented in 4.19.14. Individual optimisations This has a link to Section 4.11.2, but -fall-strict isn't described in that section. Presumably its only been half removed (added) from the documentation. k Simon Marlow writes:
On 10 Mar 2002, Jyrinx wrote:
Never fear, -fall-strict is here!
I had no idea this flag still worked. As I recall, it was an experiment that turned out to be a bad idea - you're probably just better off using seq.
Cheers, Simon _______________________________________________ Haskell mailing list Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell