Jorge Adriano <jadrian@mat.uc.pt> writes:
On Friday 25 April 2003 09:09, Ketil Z. Malde wrote:
I'm not sure I would like this. I guess I'm one of (the apparently very few?) who are using LaTeX lhs style (using \begin/\end{code}). Would a Haddock replacement give me the same kind of functionality in producing a nice printable copy? I definitely have grown attached to having math, footnotes, page headings, sections, and so on.
That makes two of us. I've been doing almost all my haskell work using lhs files + LaTeX, and I'd really miss it if was removed someday. Haddock documentation seems very nice but it serves a diferent purpose.
Chalk up one more. Is it possible to use lhs + LaTeX + Haddock (as it is) together meaningfully? If not, will it be? Feri.