Re: [Haskell] ambiguous record field names which actually aren’t ambigious

Am Montag, 28. Mai 2007 17:41 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch:

Hello,

I have the following modules:

module A where data A = A { label :: Int }

module B where data B = B { label :: Int }

b :: B b = B { label = 0 }

x :: B -> () x B { label = 0 } = ()

Oops, the indentation of the declarations of b and x was too small. Both b and x are meant to be defined in module B.

[…]

Best wishes, Wolfgang