22 Jun
2009
22 Jun
'09
12:39 p.m.
Am Freitag, 19. Juni 2009 21:35 schrieb Ian Lynagh:
So, I'd be fine with Control.Reactive.FRP, Control.Reactive.Yampa, etc, or even just Reactive.Yampa etc.
Where should the modules of Conal’s reactive package be rooted then? Under Control.Reactive.Reactive?
I don't know anything about the package, but if putting the modules directly under Control.Reactive wouldn't make sense then it sounds to me like the package name is poor (too generic).
reactive is a specific FRP implementation by Conal Elliott. So it shouldn’t be put directly under Control.Reactive since other reasonable FRP implementations exist. Best wishes, Wolfgang