31 May
2001
31 May
'01
7:20 a.m.
Henrik Nilsson wrote:
So, if, in the interest of being conservative, the stated minimal bound cannot be "infinity", could it at least be a great deal bigger than what reasonably would be used in *hand-written* code? Say 15. An arbitrary choice, of course, but it is not excessive from an implementation perspective, yet large enough that I cannot imagine hand-written code getting close to the limit.
I second Henrik here, 15 is much better than 7. Cheers, Ralf