14 May
2002
14 May
'02
8:23 p.m.
On 2002-05-14T12:32:30-0400, Jan-Willem Maessen wrote:
And I'd really much rather we cleaned up the semantics of seq---or better yet, fixed the problems with lazy evaluation which make seq necessary in the first place.
A general question: What is seq useful for, other than efficiency? -- Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig QUIET! Do you smell something?