18 Jun
2009
18 Jun
'09
4:03 p.m.
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 11:05 schrieb Malcolm Wallace:
The problem with a top-level namespace like FRP is that it is a cryptic acronym: it means nothing to a novice, and may be easily confused with other acronyms by an expert. I believe top-level names should _at_the_ _very_least_ be minimally descriptive of the category of things that live in it.
So, I'd be fine with Control.Reactive.FRP, Control.Reactive.Yampa, etc, or even just Reactive.Yampa etc.
Where should the modules of Conal’s reactive package be rooted then? Under Control.Reactive.Reactive? Best wishes, Wolfgang