Brian Hulley wrote:
Taral wrote:
On 5/28/06, Dominic Steinitz <dominic.steinitz@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
Is this defined in some library? Thanks, Dominic.
Don't think so. I use:
\a b -> f (g a b)
I don't see how (.) . (.) translates into something so simple. Using c for (.) to make things easier to write, I get:
(.) . (.) === c c c === \x -> (c c c x) === \x -> (c (c x)) === \x -> (\y z -> c (c x) y z)
Here was one error ^^^^ so fixing it and continuing: \x -> (c (c x)) === \x -> (\y z -> c (c x) z y) === \x -> (\y z -> (c x) (z y)) === \x -> (\y z -> (\p q -> c x q p) (z y)) === \x -> (\y z -> (\p q -> x (q p)) (z y)) === \x -> (\y z -> (\q -> x (q (z y)))) === \x y z q -> x (q (z y)) But it still doesn't match f (g a b)... Regards, Brian.