11 Aug
2003
11 Aug
'03
1:20 a.m.
In article <Pine.LNX.4.21.0308091624490.22529-100000@dark.darkweb.com>, Ben Rudiak-Gould <benrg@dark.darkweb.com> wrote:
The proposed notation seems to be almost the same as the existing field-label notation semantically as well as syntactically, which suggests that it wouldn't be a destabilizing addition. (See section 2.5.)
Might these be unified in any useful way? -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA