It's not formally defined, I'm afraid. The Haskell report simply desribes how to translate some constructs into simpler ones. It does not formally define the set of simpler one. (This isn't something I propose to fix in the revised Haskell 98 report!) Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: Juan Carlos Arévalo Baeza [mailto:jcab@roningames.com] | Sent: 10 August 2001 23:13 | To: Haskell List | Subject: Haskell Kernel | | | | Is there any place where I could find detailed | documentation on the Haskell kernel? The Haskell Report | doesn't seem to have much on this. | | Salutaciones, | JCAB | email: jcab@roningames.com | ICQ: 101728263 | The Rumblings are back: http://www.JCABs-Rumblings.com | | | | _______________________________________________ | Haskell mailing list | Haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell |