27 Sep
2006
27 Sep
'06
5:52 a.m.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 09:22:21PM -0700, Luke Evans wrote:
Here are a few 'highlights' from our feature list: - A lazily evaluated, strictly-typed language called CAL, with many similarities to Haskell
Do you think that CAL would be a good target for a Haskell compiler? In other words, would it be a good idea to use CAL as an intermediate language for a Haskell -> Java byte-code compiler? Best regards Tomasz