8 Jul
2005
8 Jul
'05
5:09 p.m.
Hello Andrew, Friday, July 08, 2005, 8:43:02 PM, you wrote: AP> It is one thing to embrace lazy evaluation order, and another to embrace AP> lazy IO (implemented using unsafeInterleaveIO). As a relative newcomer AP> to Haskell, I got the impression that the "interact" style was always a AP> hack, discarded for good reason in favor of the IO monad. Is there a AP> strong case for interact? interact are very good for filter-like programs, but i think iy's unadequate for inetractive programs. i use "main = interact (unlines...lines)" often enough -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:bulatz@HotPOP.com