RE: Literate scripts not handled correctly

The definitions of foo and bar are not at the same indentation level, so they are being rejected by the layout rule. At least, hugs and nhc98 accept it if you indent bar by two spaces, ghc still complains:

ghc -c lit.lhs lit.lhs:9: parse error on input `_'

Then I think hugs and nhc98 are wrong. The report states that the unliterate version of the file is recovered by "taking only those lines beginning with '>', and removing the first character of those lines", which would leave the lines indented by a single space, not two. Cheers, Simon