Re: mapM_ for bytestring

Personally, I would support its inclusion. It is an annoying repetition -- but then so is the entire bytestring API -- so there is no real point in just randomly omitting this one combinator. -Edward On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Artyom Kazak wrote:

Would this be an appropriate place to propose adding mapM_ (and then possibly mapM) to bytestring library?

Was it suggested before? If yes, why was it rejected?

______________________________**_________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/**mailman/listinfo/librarieshttp://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries