Re: Haskell Extensions in various compilers (Cabal)

Martin Sjögren writes:

...

If you mean restricted type synonyms (http://cvs.haskell.org/Hugs/pages/users_guide/restricted-synonyms.html), I think the constructor should be called RestrictedTypeSynonyms. :)

Nope. RestrictedTypeSynonyms is already there. Malcolm Wallace writes:

Or, if you mean something like data Dummy a; then how about EmptyDataDecls or VoidDataTypes?

Yep, that's what I meant. I'll call them VoidDataTypes. Thanks! peace, isaac