I would ignore that comment actually, it's not well thought out. (I was roughly meaning that I don't want to write `import Prelude (x1, x2, ..., x500)`, but this isn't a valid argument as I don't actually explicitly import `Prelude` anyway). That said, I would still prefer as many symbols as possible to have explicit binding sites, which means I would prefer to be explicit about my import to `on` rather than assume it from the Prelude. On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:49 PM Helmut Schmidt <helmut.schmidt.4711@gmail.com> wrote:
What do you mean by "I'd also rather that not be a huge single line from one module"? Can you elaborate how this relates to the proposal?
Am Mi., 11. Sept. 2019 um 14:45 Uhr schrieb Oliver Charles <ollie@ocharles.org.uk>:
I would prefer *everything* to have an explicit import "binding site", and I'd also rather that not be a huge single line from one module (though of course, I can break the import up other multiple lines).