Re: Votes for generalizing mapM &c.

There is also a poll with er.. somewhat biased wording that was being floated around the #haskell channel that has received 100+ responses if you want a broader spectrum response, even if its not very scientific. Form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1lKckA0pA6K4uQ-UnnmjRR32PKHph0WeZoQeVTTQJZ4I... Results: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1lKckA0pA6K4uQ-UnnmjRR32PKHph0WeZoQeVTTQJZ4I... -Edward On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Casey McCann wrote:

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Ian Lynagh wrote:

...

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:49:29AM +0800, John Lato wrote:

...

I suggest that we start a poll for a single, concrete proposal. If the poll forum is by email or similar, I further suggest that replies be limited strictly to +1/-1.

Here are the current totals by my count, ignoring any 0s:

...

* Generalise Prelude.mapM etc

+13 / -0

...

* Remove Prelude.mapM etc

+1 / -11

...

* Add more monomorphic variants to Prelude (e.g. whenJust)

+0 / -12

...

* Nothing

+0 / -13

- C.

_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries