Re: Monad of no `return` Proposal (MRP): Moving `return` out of `Monad`

Box is good but overlaps with unboxed/boxed types. Wrap is good. On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Imants Cekusins <imantc@gmail.com> wrote:

...

wish it wasn't named pure

How about "wrap" or "box" (as in box-unbox)?

-- Chris Allen Currently working on http://haskellbook.com