I think there was some discussion of this recently. We already have V1 in GHC.Generics; perhaps that could be given a better name. On Feb 15, 2017 6:55 PM, "Bryan O'Sullivan" <bos@serpentine.com> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Michael Walker <mike@barrucadu.co.uk> wrote:
I left this sitting alone in a Utils module until last night when I saw someone ask in #haskell if there was "a Void1 type defined in some central place". So, in case this is of more general interest, I propose that a module Data.Functor.Void be added to base.
I think the bar for adding things to base is higher than "two people found it useful"...
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries