Hi, infixr seeems right for an equivalence (==) since implication is usually also right associative. Implication "==>" corresponds to "<=" on Bool, which might be confusing. Reverse implication (>=) should be left associative, then. Cheers Christian Am 17.09.2018 um 11:28 schrieb Dannyu NDos:
Well, infixr is friendlier to parsers.
2018년 9월 17일 (월) 오후 6:22, David Feuer <david.feuer@gmail.com <mailto:david.feuer@gmail.com>>님이 작성:
Looks good to me! Do you have an opinion about infixl vs infixr?
Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org <mailto:Libraries@haskell.org> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries