17 Mar
2015
17 Mar
'15
4:50 a.m.
That sounds about right. Data.Maybe is out of the way enough few would object if we extending it to include that function. I'm pretty much +/- 0 on it. -Edward On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Henning Thielemann < lemming@henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Edward Kmett wrote:
Usually that second op is given a different name. e.g. filterMapM or
something.
If it is a mapMaybe, why not mapMaybeA or mapMaybeM?
_______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list Libraries@haskell.org http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries